Michela Massimi discusses how a perspectivalist ontology might look, and the role of situated epistemic communities and multiculturalism in shaping the metaphysics of nature.
Read more
Lorenzo Spagnesi argues that Kant’s account of theoretical reason can inform the contemporary debate over unity and pluralism of science.
Read more
Dr Ana-Maria Cretu analyses how perspectivalism enters into ‘scientific instruments’ and associated notions such as objectivity.
Read more
Franklin Jacoby discusses the Chemical revolution and the historical disagreement around phlogiston vs oxygen through the lenses of perspectivism.
Read more
Michela Massimi discusses Bayesian methods in contemporary observational cosmology. She argues that they enter into three main tasks: (I) cross-checking datasets for consistency; (II) fixing constraints on cosmological parameters; and (III) model selection. This article explores some epistemic limits of using Bayesian methods. The first limit concerns the degree of informativeness of the Bayesian priors […]
Read more
In this review, Lorenzo Spagnesi analyses Marcus Willaschek’s new book on the Dialectic of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. In his book, Willaschek sets out to isolate and defend the constructive account of the Dialectic – what he calls the Rational Sources Account (RSA). On his reading, RSA states that metaphysical thinking arises from the very structure […]
Read more
Michela Massimi reflects on the importance of investing in fundamental research as part of the Future Circular Collider 2019 Week, and interdisciplinary panel discussion “Investing in Fundamental Science: for whom?” Open access PDF available here. Massimi, M. (forthcoming) “The importance of investing in fundamental research”, in The Economics of Big Science. Essays by leading scientists […]
Read more
This paper uses several case studies to suggest that 1) two prominent definitions of data do not on their own capture how scientists use data and 2) a novel perspectival account of data is needed. It then outlines some key features of what this account could look like. Those views, the relational and representational, do […]
Read more
An international Workshop co-organised with Dr Panagiotis Charitos (CERN) 22nd–23rd April 2021, virtual ZOOM meeting, N.B. Central European Time, i.e. commences 13.00 BST (Edinburgh) This workshop brings together a multi-disciplinary group including philosophers of science, political philosophers, physicists, and economists to discuss a wealth of issues on science and justice, especially large-investments in Big Science […]
Read more
Michela Massimi is the Guest Editor for a Topical Collection on Perspectivism in the European Journal for the Philosophy of Science. The European Journal for the Philosophy of Science is excited to announce the Call for Papers for a topical collection dedicated to Scientific Perspectivism. The goal and rationale for this topical collection is to […]
Read more
In this encyclopaedia entry, Dr Cretu discusses perspectival realism and two main arguments for it: The Synchronic Argument from Modelling Practices and the The Diachronic Argument from History of Science. Open access PDF available here. Creţu AM. (2020) Perspectival Realism. In: Peters M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore
Read more
26th-28th April 2021, online ZOOM, Edinburgh local time The goal of this third and final international conference is to explore the metaphysical implications of perspectivism for contemporary philosophy of science.
Read more
This open access book explores some of the historical roots and epistemological ramifications of perspectivism. Perspectivism has recently emerged in philosophy of science as an interesting new position in the debate between scientific realism and anti-realism. But there is a lot more to perspectivism than discussions in philosophy of science so far have suggested. Perspectivism […]
Read more
This paper attends to two main tasks. First, I introduce the notion of perspectival disagreement in science. Second, I relate perspectival disagreement in science to the broader issue of realism about science: how to maintain realist ontological commitments in the face of perspectival disagreement among scientists? I argue that often enough perspectival disagreement is not […]
Read more
This paper bridges a historiographical gap in accounts of the prediction and discovery of the positron by combining three ingredients. First, the prediction and discovery of the positron are situated in the broader context of a period of ‘crystallisation’ of a research tradition. Second, the prediction and discovery of the positron are discussed in the […]
Read more
In this paper, I go back to Bas van Fraassen’s seminal discussion of perspectivity in the context of scientific representation. I distinguish between two possible ways of locating the perspectival nature of the representation by drawing an analogy between art and science. I highlight a tension between what I call the representationalist assumption and the […]
Read more
In the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, General Remark to Phenomenology, Kant argued that absolute space “is therefore necessary, not as a concept of an actual object, but rather as an idea, which is to serve as a rule for considering all motion therein merely as relative” (AA 4: 560). I argue that Kantian absolute […]
Read more
This edited collection is the first of its kind to explore the view called perspectivism in philosophy of science. The book brings together an array of essays that reflect on the methodological promises and scientific challenges of perspectivism in a variety of fields such as physics, biology, cognitive neuroscience, and cancer research, just as a […]
Read more
I analyse the exploratory function of two main modelling practices: targetless fictional models and hypothetical perspectival models. In both cases, I argue, modelers invite us to imagine or conceive something about the target system, which is either known to be non-existent (fictional models) or just hypothetical (in perspectival models). I clarify the kind of imagining […]
Read more
Michela Massimi’s Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Medal Lecture, Royal Society (2017). In an era where science is increasingly specialised, what is the value of interdisciplinary research? I argue that research across disciplinary boundaries plays a pivotal role in scientific inquiry, and it has a threefold value: it is exploratory; it is unifying; and it offers critical engagement. Philosophy […]
Read more
11th-12th February 2019, Playfair Library, Old College, University of Edinburgh Co-sponsored and co-hosted with the Higgs Centre for Theoretical Physics, this two-day workshop will bring together particle physicists, astrophysicists and cosmologists to discuss the state of the art on methodological challenges and promises in using model-independent searches across a range of areas and searches. Registration […]
Read more
13th-14th December 2018, 0930, Rm G32, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ The goal of this second international conference is to investigate the roots of perspectivism in the history of early modern philosophy and its ramifications for contemporary debates in epistemology.
Read more
In this paper, Michela looks at the DES Year 1 results and in particular considers the use of the Bayes factor along the Jeffreys scale in DES model selection. She draws attention to some of the advantages but also to some epistemic limits arising from the use of the Bayes factor. Link to Edinburgh Research […]
Read more
The goal of this article is to address the problem of inconsistent models, and the challenge it poses for perspectivism. I analyse the argument, draw attention to some hidden premises behind it, and deflate them. Then I introduce the notion of perspectival models as a distinctive class of modeling practices, whose primary function is exploratory. […]
Read more
The aim of this paper is to cast new light on an important and often overlooked notion of perspectival knowledge arising from Kant.
Read more